“Is there a rich clown and a poor clown?” This is the discovery of the baldness of nepotism.”

Statements by Francisco J. Márquez, Communications Director of FC Porto, about the Universo Porto da Bancada programme, on TV Porto

Bibi and APAF post: “APAF, owned by Luciano Gonçalves, who has a relationship with Benfica that he has tried to hide and that makes him, from a moral point of view, ineligible for any place. If the referees want this person to represent them…” CA and APAF have not shown public concern about the refereeing situation and use sources in Newspapers to convey information about their involvement. This is very dangerous. “They passed information under the door, or through the horse door.”

Poor clown and rich clown: “For what purpose is the circus tent spread on social media and they did not do it after Braga – Benfica, in the cup, where Rui Costa waited for Thiago Martins and then Hugo Felix, brother of Joao Felix and Benfica player, retweeted Antonio Silva and used a picture of a clown. I did not see any News about participation. Is there a rich clown and a poor clown? This is the discovery of baldness. Prejudice. They owe a request to apologize to Bibi. Did the chartered accountant get used to publishing news in the newspapers? Is this behavior correct?