5 Things I Didn't Like About Money In The Bank

5 Things I Didn't Like About Money In The Bank

That's really what WWE has done in recent months: wherever they go, they've managed to sell out arenas, and even if the event is disappointing, the crowd energy is tremendous and it's a financial success for the company.

A good example of this is last weekend's Money in the Bank pay-per-view, which was unfortunately disappointing in terms of matches, but was not a financial disaster for WWE.

But despite that, we cannot ignore that Featured Live Event It wasn't delivered well, especially when there was a time when it would become one of the company's most important games, better than Survivor Series, but it seems to have been on the decline in recent years.

In the past, the purse winner was the fighter who deserved to get a push and this would be his big chance, but lately the winners have become forgotten.

Furthermore, I expected to see developments at SummerSlam, maybe at least Logan Paul costing the LA Knights a win but we didn't even have that, and it didn't create any more interest in the next event.

I expected more from this event, and I thought Triple H would raise the bar for Money in the Bank again, but that wasn't the case, so let's take a look at the five things I didn't like to see in this event. Featured Live Event.

See also  The (uncomfortable) truth that astrologers don't want you to know

By Shirley Farmer

"Infuriatingly humble analyst. Bacon maven. Proud food specialist. Certified reader. Avid writer. Zombie advocate. Incurable problem solver."